Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005, Jerry Feldman wrote: > On Wednesday 15 June 2005 3:47 pm, Kyle Plummer wrote: > > Although not directly a linux question? I have a client who is thinking > > about using Oracle, IBM or MS SQL for a large DB project. His question > > to me is which is a more stable/reliable/scalable database? > > > > Thanks for your input. > MS SQL locks you into a Windows server. MS SQL limits you in other ways, too. I worked with a client who was using MS SQL Server Small Business. The server was maxing out, so he spoke to MSFT about his options. The Small Business licence/software is only designed for a certain load. MSFT quoted him about $11,000 to go up to the next level. He decided to take that $11,000 or so and put it towards rewriting the DB layer of the software to talk to MySQL instead ;) ------------------------------------------------------------------- DDDD David Kramer http://thekramers.net DK KD Math is pure science. DKK D Physics is noisy math. DK KD Chemistry is smelly physics. DDDD Biology is squishy chemistry.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |