Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On 8/7/05, Tom Metro <blu at vl.com> wrote: > David Kramer wrote: > > I usually wire my IDE chain like: > > > > IDE0M Main boot hard drive, software, etc > > IDE0S Optical drive of some sort > > IDE1M Second hard drive, mostly data, apache documentroot, tmp, etc > > IDE1S Optical drive of some sort > > > > The theory is both hard drives should be on separate channels so they > > can talk at the same time. > > Sounds like a reasonable theory, but what I recall reading about IDE > master/slave pairings is that it is better to pair fast devices > together, as an optical device, which might require a slow IDE mode, can > degrade the performance of a faster device on the same channel. > Accordingly I've always paired my hard drives, and placed optical and > zip drives on the secondary channel. > > However, I don't have a lot of confidence in that recollection, and it > may be based on faulty information. Has anyone else heard similar or > conflicting information? > > Also, given the oddities of IDE and the problems you can occasionally > encounter with certain master/slave pairings, I wouldn't bet on this > behavior being consistent. It probably is affected by which device is > the master as well. Not to mention that the recommendation might have > made assumptions about the IDE driver (such as assuming the behavior of > the Windows IDE driver, which many not be applicable to the Linux IDE > driver). > > Conversely, the separate channels theory might similarly fail to provide > a benefit if the IDE controller isn't capable of doing DMA to both > channels at the same time. > > Practically speaking, the only way to know would be to benchmark the two > different configurations. Or, if you're really concerned about > performance, buy a SATA controller for your hard drives and use > SATA-to-PATA adapters. That'll also address your cabling complications. > > -Tom > > If you are really worried about performance, put each device on its own cable. The opticals being on their own can help if you are burning or ripping a lot. MEG
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |