Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 01:40:27PM -0400, Josh ChaitinPollak wrote: > > On Aug 8, 2005, at 6:38 PM, Matt Galster wrote: > >Is this LEO sat? 75 ms seems pretty dogone low for latency on > >satellite. > > > > Sorry, I misunderstood, we are using http://towerstream.com/, which > isn't Sat-service, but is T1 point-to-point wireless. They have no > discussion of the technology on their website however. I'm not sure > how it works, or how we are guaranteed any security. Towerstream usually does better than 75ms latency. However, their reliability is terrible. I do not believe this is a technology problem so much as a manpower and network design problem. They use a proprietary 5.8GHz system, no particular security except that the equipment is expensive and hard to find. They do have the ability to install in about 3 days, and to turn up bandwidth almost instantaneously. For this you pay a price on the high side for a T1, and, as I said, their reliability is low. -dsr-
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |