Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Sorry for the late reply but this message didn't seem to get any replies. I'm rejoining this list after a few years away from Boston. <quote who="dan moylan" date="Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 11:53:45AM -0500"> > FC4 seems to have no xbiff nor have i been able to uncover > a replacement, if there is one. anyone know? I currently use xbuffy which seems more powerful and flexible than xbiff. I have also used gbuffy and buffy. Buffy seems to be the latest and most actively maintained and has extension in quite a few languages for those that like to customize things. As soon as I write up a xbuffy-like mode for buffy, I will probably switch to it. Regards, Mako -- Benjamin Mako Hill mako at debian.org http://mako.cc/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.blu.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20050824/295fb31f/attachment.sig>
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |