Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Bill Horne wrote: | Sorry to butt in, but I'm confused by the various "outbound" vs. | "inbound" labels on this topic. | | Let's agree on a standard definintion of "inbound" and "outbound", so we | know what direction(s) we're discussing: | | 1. Inbound refers to traffic coming FROM comcast TOWARD my machine | 2. Outbound refers to traffic going FROM my machine TOWARD comcast. | | Does that work for everyone? That's exactly how I use them. I guess I'd assume that those are the usual definitions. What seems really inconsistent is the ways people use "upload" and "download". I once thought I knew what they meant, but I've seen many cases where people obviously have the definitions reversed. Of course, trying to get computer people to agree on definitions is just asking for a long flame war. I remember years ago on one project, where I eventually figured out that one problem we had was that the unix and vms crowds used exactly reversed definitions of "d[a]emon" and "server". Neither crowd would budge, because they were right and the others were wrong. I thought it was funny. I also made the observation that the unix crowd were obviously using James Clerk Maxwell's definition of "daemon", which predates both unix and vms by a century or so, so by standard scientific precedence rules this should be the accepted usage. The unix crowd liked this, but the vms crowd thought Maxwell was quite irrelevant. ("Who's he?")
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |