Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
>>> It is. xhost +localhost has always been a feature of the user profile. >> >> >> I just discovered a subtilety in the behavior. If I "su -" directly >> from user I do not have the problem. It is when I first "su" and then >> "su -" that xhost is unable to open the display. >> So does this narrow the possibilities? I have two Fc4 systems I can >> compare. Or should I leave it as a quirk that isn't worth figuring out? > > > Ummm, did you try what I already suggested? See above. > It's not a quirk. Whoever starts X is the only one who has rights to > talk to X, or enable others to talk to X. What's the mystery? The mystery is that up until this upgrade to Fc4 I was able to elevate myself to root privilege status with "su" and then from that elevated status issue "su -" and become root, all maintaining connection to the Xserver. Now, I can no longer follow that pattern. If I want to maintain connection to the Xserver I must "su -" directly from the unprivileged user status. On the other machine that I did an "install" of Fc4, and then copied back the profiles and config files to the user accounts, I can follow the old pattern of privilege elevation as I am acustommed to. > The "-" in "su -" means "Make the shell a login shell", which is > straight out of the man page. When you "su", you are elevating your > rights to that of root. When you "su -", you *become* root. There is > no subtlety. You are no longer you. > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss at blu.org > http://olduvai.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |