Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On 10/7/05, Dave Peters <gameslover987 at yahoo.com> wrote: > Hello all, > > Can anyone help me to give some ideals about what's > different between Linux CVS Server and Windows CVS > server? What is advantage and disadvantage? I try to > push for Linux CVS instead Windows. > UNLESS things have changed since last time I setup a CVS server, you can NOT USE WINDOWS as a CVS server operating system for more than a local client, meaning it is only good for a single user. So much for enabling the concept of collaboration. Actually, I checked the CVS book on it (http://cvsbook.red-bean.com/cvsbook.html) Limitations Of The Windows And Macintosh Versions The Windows and Macintosh distributions of CVS are generally limited in functionality. They can all act as clients, meaning that they can contact a repository server to obtain a working copy, commit, update, and so on. But they can't serve repositories themselves. If you set it up right, the Windows port can use a local-disk repository, but it still can't serve projects from that repository to other machines. In general, if you want to have a network-accessible CVS repository, you must run the CVS server on a Unix box.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |