Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 08:15:18PM -0500, Don Levey wrote: > dsr wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 02:46:13PM -0500, Don Levey wrote: > > I got the same output from e2fsck regardless of the alternate superblock I > provided. Looks like I'll be pulling off the data using dd, and then > working with a utility such as spinrite. Interestingly, I saw no problems > in the logs at all from smartd, so it looks like the rest of the drive > should be OK, right? Or should I just replace the whole thing? You should assume the disk is ready to die. If you've got an application which can use a lot of unreliable storage -- image editing or music or movie editing, for example -- you could keep the drive around for that until it fails. I second the recommendation for using testdisk, by the way. Now is a good time to ask yourself: is Linux software RAID right for me? The cost of disks is relatively low, and disk mirroring is remarkably effective when coupled with a decent UPS... -dsr-
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |