Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
dsr at tao.merseine.nu suggested: > I would recommend using rsync rather than dd, > and then reinstalling your boot loader. Hmm, good question which way to go with that. A drive which is failing might go further south more quickly if you give it a workout. Most of the power consumed by a hard drive (at least, the 3.5" ones, don't know about the smaller ones) during heavy I/O operations is not in the spindle motor--it's in the solenoid which drives the head assembly. Takes a lot of current to physically move the mass from one location to another, with precision, in less than a hundredth of a second. Bottom line: the rsync command will generate a lot of head seeks. The dd command won't. Depending on the nature of the drive's failure (are more bad blocks appearing as you use the drive?) you might want to consider this fact as you attempt recovery. One obvious thing you can do to maximize your chances is to run the system with the case open and add supplemental cooling from a fan directly onto the drive. -rich
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |