![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Bob George <mailings02 at ttlexceeded.com> suggested: > Before popping for another piece of equipment, I'd try using some of the > higher-gain antennas that fit the Linksys. I just had some equipment failures this past week and have some observations: * My first-gen Linksys WRT54G unit (purchased in March 2003) abruptly died. * I noticed it had a 3-year warranty and dialed the Linksys/Cisco call center (yes it's in India, the service rep let slip with "have a good night" at the end of my noontime call...;-). The free replacement was sent FedEx 3-day immediately after my call. I only had to pay for the $7.50 UPS ground shipping of my return unit, *after* receiving the replacement. * The new unit has the same model number -- WRT54G -- but is version 4. It has *far* superior range! The first-gen units apparently had *very* weak signal power! (I'm talking 20 feet through wood-frame construction.) * Back when I first bought the unit (replacement for WAP11 802.11b unit), I tried an external higher-gain antenna (SMC HMANT-4). It didn't do jack for my signal range. * Not many days later, when I was fixing up the cable mess caused by my wi-fi replacement, somehow my DLINK DI-604 firewall died. My first instinct was to replace it with another DLINK but then I decided to try using the WRT54G's built-in firewall. Seems to work fine, I haven't yet tried any benchmarks. (The DI-604 had no problem with Comcast's 4-megabit service, it could run downloads at wirespeed. One feature still missing in the new WRT54G code is port-number translation: if you want sshd to listen on port 54623 instead of port 22, you can't do the mapping at the WRT54G firewall--you have to reconfigure your Linux box.) * As part of my energy-conservation project, I noticed that my old Netgear 8-port 10/100 switch consumed 12 watts of electricity. For not much money I ditched it for a gigE switch of the same brand. The new switch consumes 4 watts and runs cooler. * If you re-cable your LAN for gigE, note that you need all 4 pairs of wire in the patch cables. You can't economize with 2-pair wiring which I did when I first wired the house, so it took some extra cabling. Bottom line: if you have an old 802.11g unit whose signal is weak, you will probably get a meaningful benefit replacing it with any newer unit--you don't necessarily need to shell out the extra bucks for one of those standards-noncompliant "RangeMax" units. -rich
![]() |
|
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |