Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
I see. Well, it seems you learned the hard way that resizing partitions isn't something that LVM was designed to handle. That also explains why you had a much easier time with qt_parted. LVM's purpose is to allow you to shuffle fixed-size devices (or partitions) around underneath the filesystem layer. An approach to your problem that would lend itself to the use of LVM would have been to create a bunch of medium-sized partitions, then add or delete those partitions to your LVM as desired (admittedly I don't know how that approach would interact with vmware virtual disks). But the situation you're in, with only 4 partitions (presumably all needed), means you're stuck using qt_parted. --Matt Derek Atkins wrote: > Well, I was /trying/ to be abstract, here, but the real answer is > "I resized my vmware virtual disk into a larger size and I want > to increase the size of my root partition on that virtual disk". > > Besides, you can't have more than four native partitions and only > one of them can be an extended partition. So once your disk is > partitioned fully like that then if the disk geometry changes > you need to actually mess with the partition sizes and don't have > the flexibility to just add another partition. > > -derek > > Quoting Matthew Gillen <me at mattgillen.net>: > >> Derek, >> It's not clear to me what you're talking about. What do you mean your >> physical disk "just changed" from 40GB to 80GB? If the 80GB is a new >> disk, why not re-do the partitioning and re-create the LVM according to >> the new size? If there is only one disk and the extra 40GB is from some >> other partition on the same disk (that just got re-claimed from some >> other OS), why not treat that partition as a *new* physical device? I >> can't see why you would ever want to re-size a physical device. There's >> nothing wrong with having a LogicalVolume that has two partitions from >> the same disk as physical devices. >> >> --Matt > >
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |