Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 10:13:27PM -0500, Bill Mills-Curran wrote: > I just upgraded to FC4 from FC3 and I had some troubles that should > not have happened. My FC3 system was current with updates, and I used > downloaded ISO's from fedora. The problem was that many of the FC3 > packages were more up to date than the FC4 packages, so the upgrade > did not install them. This included the kernel. I felt lucky that I > had a workable system. Sorry to hear things haven't gotten any better since my days as an RH user (pre-RH9). I never experienced a smooth upgrade; sometimes had to just rebuild the system. I drifted from RH to Mandrake (pre-Mandriva) and then to Gentoo. Though not without the occasional bump, I've found Gentoo's approach to package management the least violent of them all. Nathan > > Running up2date did not help -- I was still in an FC3 system (kind of). > > I manually installed the FC4 kernel and ran up2date again, but it was > stuck on many packages, because up2date only wanted to freshen > existing rpm's -- it didn't want to add any new ones to solve > dependencies. > > After much arm-wrestling (floundering?), I gave up on the GUI up2date > and ran with the command line, feeding it chunks of rpms that needed > updating. > > I feel lucky that I didn't brick my system. What did I do wrong? > This must be a common occurance. I have another system that I need to > upgrade, but I don't want it to go like this. What's a better way? > > Thanks, > Bill > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss at blu.org > http://olduvai.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |