Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Hello, I'm working for a startup and we are about to buy a lot of rackmount gear -- a little bit for our internal development, and a lot (15-20 servers to start) to go into a local colo facility for staging/production type use. We've been going back and forth on the different vendors. I personally like HP, and have had decent luck with their DL series equipment - mostly 1-2U Intel based servers. Dell seems to be a little less expensive and I can see a few minor reasons why there are plusses and minuses to purchasing their gear (example: Dell makes you pay extra for a PCI card that handles remote management where HP puts a port on the motherboard for that; dell includes a CD-ROM and HP makes you pay over $100 extra for one!). Does anyone have any good reason we should NOT buy Dell gear? I have priced out the equivalent machines with HP, Dell, Sun, along with local vendors like pcs4everyone. All the equipment is in the same general ballpark per server class, but on high-end machines where cost is less of an issue than getting the fastest chips, the small vendors generally don't have access to the very latest technologies (example: pcsforeveryone doesn't have any dual-core Xeon chips in its line yet). Any thoughts on vendors you like, don't like, reasons why? I know this is a bit of an age-old-question, but I'm interested to here recent successes/failures. All of this equipment will likely be running Linux (Perhaps CentOS, perhaps RedHat Enterprise, perhaps some flavor of vmware). We'd rather have one vendor and try to keep the hardware as similar to each other as possible. Thanks for any info - Steve
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |