![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
James Kramer wrote: > Some questions I have and would appreciate some insight. It seems to me > that Xen type systems may become more common in the future. If so, > would 64 bit be a better option? How much difference is there in > converting software to 64 bit. I realize that memory allocation would > be different but is there much more work then recompiling the code? > These are all questions--I don't know the answers. I have converted > some Fortran code from 64 bit mainframe to 16 bit PC and I really don't > remember worrying about the number of bits. How much more conversion is > necessary. > Thanks for the help > jay > > On 3/6/06, *jbk* <jbk at mail2.gis.net <mailto:jbk at mail2.gis.net>> wrote: > > Jerry Feldman wrote: > > On Sunday 05 March 2006 4:35 pm, Chris Ball wrote: > > > >>At least on Ubuntu, the version of OO installed on the 64-bit > >>distribution is the 32-bit binary using 32-bit compatibility > >>libraries, so it makes sense that it might be sluggish compared > >>to native 32-bit. > > > > One of the nice things about the x86-64 architecture is that it > does support > > the 32-bit architecture in hardware. > > So, a few years ago I was really impressed with how much > faster the dec alpas were. Now it seems that the 32bit wafer > technology has caught up and the difference is now only > maybe 10%. It would seem to me that this is not enough of a > difference to drive a switch to 64bit arch, other than the > previously stated fact that there will be no more 32bit > chips from the big two after this year. The software writers > have no motivation to convert to 64 bit rapidly, they will > eventually but not as a need but just as a function of the > experience of the programmers that succeed those coding now. > > Jim > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss at blu.org <mailto:Discuss at blu.org> > http://olduvai.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > > James, You posted this to me and left out blu.org. So I'm forwarding this so that those more knowledgeable in coding can respond. Jim
![]() |
|
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |