![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
John Westcott IV wrote: > What distro of Linux are people running on their production servers? > Does anyone run open distros (like OpenSuSE or Fedora) on production > servers? I'm running Fedora on a few. > I am looking at a new HP server and wondering if the support of a > commercial distro is worth it. As always, it depends. The thing to worry about with Fedora is quick (6-month) release cycle. As a general rule, RedHat (and I'm sure the others have the same policy) will not make incompatible upgrades of packages within a release. What that means is that if version X of Redhat shipped with Apache 1.x, there will never be an "update" to version X that includes Apache 2.x. You'd have to wait for Redhat version Y. So Fedora (and Ubuntu, OpenSuse, etc) is great for fast-evolving software like the desktop applications. It's also great if you want the latest feature in Apache, etc. The flip side of that coin is that if you have say, a web application in php, you're going to have to port it to a new release of apache and php more often (supposing there are major version bumps in apache and php). Bottom line: it's mostly an issue of admin time. Fedora and other fast-release distros will cost a lot more in admin time, since you're "forced" to upgrade more often. Matt
![]() |
|
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |