Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 11:11:31 -0500 Brendan <mailinglist at endosquid.com> wrote: > In my personal life, I eagerly anticipate the releases of all the > Debian-derivatives. Mepis was my favorite, but I find myself leaning towards > Kubuntu. The *Real* problem is that I only reinstall when there is an > unsolvable problem with the system, and with Debian, that hasn't happened in > nearly two years, so.... The keys to servers: 1. Stability. You want the server to be very reliable. High availability, and no applications crashing. And, you may want features like ILO so that you can manage the server remotely for just about everything. 2. You don't want stuff installed on the server that is not going to be used. While both RHEL and SLES do install X, it is intended for management. SLES9 out of the box does not even come with a compiler of development tools because you don't really want that on a production server, so to add the compilers and tools SuSE provides an SDK. And, as someone previously mentioned, both RHEL can use kickstart and SLES can use autoyast. -- Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org> Boston Linux and Unix user group http://www.blu.org PGP key id:C5061EA9 PGP Key fingerprint:053C 73EC 3AC1 5C44 3E14 9245 FB00 3ED5 C506 1EA9 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.blu.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20060318/e7140891/attachment.sig>
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |