Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Friday 07 April 2006 10:50, Jerry Feldman wrote: > On Friday 07 April 2006 10:37 am, david at thekramers.net wrote: > > Correct. That's where the "as we know it" part comes in. > > > > Certainly there will be big changes in direction, and Fedora turns back > > into a proving ground and farm team for commercial Red Hat. > > Possibly. I think that was RH's intention in the first place. > If you have seen SuSE's plans, they show that the SLES and SLED products > are built on SuSE Linux (retail) which is built on Open SuSE. They are very > open in saying that OpenSuSE and SuSE retail is their cutting edge product > and they build their enterprise products on the same base. Fedora's strong point is to have a somewhat-aligned desktop to go with the supported servers. To me, there are FAR better desktops, but Fedora is all that is supported so...
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |