Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 11:25:35AM -0400, Kent Borg wrote: > Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 11:25:35 -0400 > From: Kent Borg <kentborg at borg.org> > To: discuss at blu.org > Subject: Re: Backup Question, Preserving Hard Links > Precedence: list > > On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 05:43:02PM -0400, Kent Borg wrote: > > I am looking for a way to: > > [...] > > OK, I don't see a bunch of answers to my "what to use when rsync can't > handle it"-question. > > Let me try a different question... > > Let's say I have two disk volumes (or directory trees) that exactly > match in contents--except one has extra files that aren't present on > the other. How can I efficiently remove the extra files so the two > copies really do match? > > > Thanks, > > -kb, the Kent who could then at least get rid of the big delete step > in his current method. > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss at blu.org > http://olduvai.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss Try this: rsync -rltpuv --delete <source> <target> If your mod time & size are not reliable (already synchronized), then try adding the "-c" option to use checksums instead. The "--delete" will remove "extra" files from the target. Suggestion: I always do a "dry run" first by adding the "-n" option to preview what rsync will do -- I sometimes misuse the directory spec, and the dry run makes that pretty clear. Bill
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |