![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
David Kramer wrote: > Is there any security risk from using the default port and IP address > for VPN, or should I change it to something more obscure? Running on non-standard ports doesn't /really/ buy you any additional security, even though it feels like it does. It might stop some script-kiddies, but it won't stop (barely even slow down) someone who knows what they're doing. (and of course eventually the port-scanning of the script kiddies will get more sophisticated) It's generally better to have the "this service is exposed! I must watch it!" feeling, than to have the "this service is hidden, I don't need to worry about its security issues" attitude when the service isn't hidden very well at all. If you're really paranoid, you can look into setting up a port-knocking scheme: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Port_knocking Matt -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
![]() |
|
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |