Boston Linux & Unix (BLU) Home | Calendar | Mail Lists | List Archives | Desktop SIG | Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings
Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU

BLU Discuss list archive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

SATA vs ATA (EIDE)



On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 07:51:42AM -0400, markw at mohawksoft.com wrote:
> Does anyone have an opinion about which one is better? Interface and I/O
> speed? DMA? Compatibility with Linux?

The only concern I've had is that older kernels (2.4) generally
don't have much SATA support. Building new boxes with Debian and
SLES10, I've had no complaints at all.

-dsr-


-- 
-. ---   -- --- .-. .   ... . -.-. .-. . - ... 
..-. ..- -.-. -.-   - .... .   -. ... .- 
..-.   ..-   -.-. -.   .-. -..   - .... ...   ..-   -.- -. .--   -.-. -..


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.





BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS!



Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org