Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Guys, I'm setting up a new repository for a business I'm consulting for. They are currently a clear case house. One thing which I've noticed is that they store all output file from the build into their clearcase repository. This goes against my philosophy that the only thing which goes into a source code repository are the files which are needed to build the executables, and not the executables themselves. Now I'm having seconds thoughts about my "what gets stored in a source code repository" philosophy. Can anyone comment on whether its custom to archive the executables as well? One issue is that I'm working under a quality system so control of files is required. I supposed this meant control of source files, but perhaps control of derived binaries from the source files is also required? As usual, all comments are greatly appreciated. Cheers. Steve. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |