BLU Discuss list archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[BLU/Discuss] Are We Back?

Subject: [BLU/Discuss] Are We Back?
From: bill at horne.net (Bill Horne)
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 23:38:05 -0500
In-reply-to: <20061129215216.H8517@bloop.local>
References: <20061129094849.A22138@borg.org> <456D9F63.4010509@napc.com> <1164816068.19343.25.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20061129202032.GA20416@reddog.kinz.org> <20061129215216.H8517@bloop.local>

Bob Leigh wrote:
> Jeff Kinz <jkinz at kinz.org> wrote:
>   
>> Can we go back to the original subject line format that doesn't take up
>> space with the redundant List-ID label? 
>>     
>
> I would vote for a compromise like "[BLU]", personally.

Seconded.

Bill

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

Follow-Ups:
- [BLU/Discuss] Are We Back?
  - From: gmongardi at napc.com (Grant M.)
- [BLU/Discuss] Are We Back?
  - From: gmongardi at napc.com (Grant M.)

References:
- [BLU/Discuss] Are We Back?
  - From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [BLU/Discuss] Are We Back?
  - From: gmongardi at napc.com (Grant M.)
- [BLU/Discuss] Are We Back?
  - From: john.abreau at zuken.com (John Abreau)
- [BLU/Discuss] Are We Back?
  - From: jkinz at kinz.org (Jeff Kinz)
- [BLU/Discuss] Are We Back?
  - From: bobleigh at twomeeps.com (Bob Leigh)

Prev by Date: [BLU/Discuss] Are We Back?
Next by Date: [BLU/Discuss] Are We Back?
Previous by thread: [BLU/Discuss] Are We Back?
Next by thread: [BLU/Discuss] Are We Back?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread


BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org