Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Jerry Feldman wrote: > The combination of incoming SPAM traffic, SPAMassasin, and > mailscanner seem to have postfix taking too long to read mail. ... > The best solution would be to stop SPAM on the Internet :-) > More of a stopgap solution for us would be to acquire a new system. Something that might be more easily obtained than a donated server, and would also address the spam problem, is getting spam filtering services donated. Some provider, like Brightmail, might welcome the opportunity to get some publicity with a tech community in exchange for providing filtering services. However, it isn't clear to me why you need to run tools like SpamAssassin, and mailscanner on a machine used exclusively for processing list messages. Assuming all of the lists reject senders who aren't subscribers, that should take care of most of it. (A Postfix policy server could be created to reject such emails during the SMTP transaction - even before mailman gets the message.) Running SpamAssassin on what makes it past that point would be a nice enhancement, and shouldn't add much overhead. If the machine handles more than just mailing lists, then maybe general mail should be split to a different server (an option I think you mentioned). It may make sense to have Gmail host mail for the few volunteers that have @blu.org addresses. (I know JABR experimented with Gmail hosting for a blu.org subdomain.) If you did that, the top-level list aliases might even get spam filtered by Gmail before being forwarded to list at olduvai.blu.org. (olduvai.blu.org could then be firewalled to only accept connections from Gmail's servers.) > I'm also seeing some issues with the hourly cron job that JABR set up > for the virus updates. Do any of the hosted lists accept attachments? If not, why check for viruses? Why not just use a simple Postfix rule to reject everything with a binary attachment? -Tom -- Tom Metro Venture Logic, Newton, MA, USA "Enterprise solutions through open source." Professional Profile: http://tmetro.venturelogic.com/ -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |