![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Wed, 2007-01-03 at 13:47 -0500, John Abreau wrote: > > On Fri, 29 Dec 2006 15:49:48 -0500 Tom Metro quoth: > > > > > Something that might be more easily obtained than a donated server, and > > > would also address the spam problem, is getting spam filtering services > > > donated. [snip] > > On 1/3/07, Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org> wrote: > > > That's a good idea. Tom, could you contact someone on this. > > JABR are you cool with it?? > > > > It sounds like a good idea. I do have some questions about it, > of course. > > Do they check that the recipient address is valid? If so, what > happens when we add new users or new lists; is it easy to > update Brightmail's list of valid addresses? Can we maintain > whitelists, and would they be per-user or domain-wide whitelists? Since I use a dynamic dns service to receive email on my Debian box, I'll ask what happens when forward (A) and reverse (PTR) records don't match. My PTR record shows a speakeasy address, but my A record does not. Also, and I know this sounds odd but some servers do it: is there any chance that my "dynamic" domain name would be filtered even though it points to a fixed IP? I don't know why, but some System Administrators think that a "dynamic" domain name is prima facie proof of spam. Bill Horne -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
![]() |
|
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |