OpenQRM as an alternative to VMware Virtual Center

[kristian.hermansen at gmail.com (Kristian Hermansen)]

Hello my fellow hackers!

I am new to the list (and Boston) and am interested in OpenQRM as an
open-source resource management solution possibility, since VMware ESX
Server + VMware Lab Manager is mighty expensive and does not support
Solaris (SPARC).  Does anyone have experience with OpenQRM?

I would possibly use Xen, but unfortunately, I don't believe that our
server hardware (Intel Xeon) has virtualization extensions necessary
to run Windows guests unmodified.  My ultimate goal is to create a
large physical infrastructure that can launch test targets
"on-the-fly" and then instruct each guest to perform some type of test
and report back the results, then when done, clean up the environment
(revert to snapshot).  I currently have ~64 physical servers each with
8GB of memory, 800 GB of storage (400GB x 2), Intel Xeons (3.2 GHz x
2), and two NICs (1000BT x 2).  I also have set up some software-based
iSCSI targets, but pointing this many hosts at one physical iSCSI disk
causes massive slow down!

Scenario:
Simulate network of 100 Windows XP SP2, 20 Windows 2000 Pro SP4, 10
Red Hat AS 4.x, 5 Red Hat WS 3.x, and 2 Solaris 9 (SPARC) machines.  A
physically located central server, outside of this virtual
infrastructure, will process requests and communicate with all of
these virtual hosts.

Execution:
Log into some type of management interface (or shell script, api, etc)
and instruct the virtual infrastructure to create a virtual
configuration as described above.  When all machines have booted,
launch the test scripts and reports the results to some central server
(or email them).  Then revert the virtual infrastructure and/or
undeploy the configuration from the physical hardware platforms.

I am not sure if OpenQRM can even due this, as it appears to utilize
PXE booting.  This would mean that each physical server would only get
one instance, but the server has the memory/cpu/hdd capability to run
up to ~64 Operating Systems in parallel (assuming ~128MB / VM).

Any suggestions are greatly appreciated ... thanks!
-- 
Kristian Hermansen

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.