Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Martin Owens wrote: Essentially is a feature of a capitalist society. But, even at the kernel level, look at the number of different file systems we support, such as ext2, ext3, reiserfs, JFS, XFS, Minix, FAT, NTFS, and even JCSOFS. We need to support many different forms of comms, such as Ethernet, wireless, and others. And, that also adds many different chipsets, et. al. Then you have the different CPUs from the x86 to the 64-bit Alphas and IA64s. Yes but the kernel has modules, you can build as much of the features as you want; where as OpenOffice doesn't work like that down at it's core architecture. it could probably learn a lot from kernel devs. but would require a rewrite I think. No disagreement. I was just responding more to the overall bloat than to OpenOffice per se. StarOffice was somewhat bloated long before Sun bought it. -- Jerry Feldman <Jerry.Feldman at algorithmics.com> Algorithmics, Inc 617-663-5220 This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and proprietary to Algorithmics Incorporated and its affiliates ("Algorithmics"). If received in error, use is prohibited. Please destroy, and notify sender. Sender does not waive confidentiality or privilege. Internet communications cannot be guaranteed to be timely, secure, error or virus-free. Algorithmics does not accept liability for any errors or omissions. Any commitment intended to bind Algorithmics must be reduced to writing and signed by an authorized signatory. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |