using OpenDNS

[mafmanet at gmail.com (Myrle A Francis 2nd)]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I think the site admits to redirecting non-existing domain names. Thats
how it makes it money, by the ads on the redirected pages...

I was just curious about the "tech of DNS Timing" and it was worth using
this type of sites... I guess I'll just muck with it a bit and
eventually report my results...

thanks everyone.


Rajiv Aaron Manglani wrote:
>>> I was wondering has anyone used or heard of OpenDNS?
>>> (http://www.opendns.com/)
>>> Is it really better to use it or does it really not matter?... their
>>> website says it's a better DNS, so I guess it must be :)
>>
>> No, don't use it.  I tried it and what it does is redirect any
>> non-existing domain names to their custom pages.  Pretty lame.
>> Reminds me of VeriSign 2003 ;-)
> 
> 
> that is only one feature (which can easily be disabled). i found that 
> forwarding queries to their cache is actually faster than having a 
> local bind server perform its own lookups.
> 
> 
> 

- --
Myrle A. Francis 2nd

PgpServer(s): pgp.mit.edu

Type bits /keyID    Date       User ID
pub  1024D/30BDB814 2006/07/27 Myrle A. Francis 2nd <mafmanet at gmail.com>
     Key fingerprint = 73E3 6EAF EC29 29A3 94F9  6C78 F427 0FE8 30BD B814



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFv2729CcP6DC9uBQRAna+AKCXHN5rdtC2qR2LCKoeoiajTmn5UACfW7gD
kS5uzcl/USJv3+dtazvncg8=
=LlcQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.