![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
David Kramer wrote: > That's motivation, not justification. It's clear why the FSF (and the > vast majority of the Open Source community) would not want Novell to > partner with MSFT as they did, but the question remains, how is FSF > going to block Novell from selling Linux, and what legal means will they > use to enforce it. IANAL, but my half-a$$ed understanding is that FSF can't block distribution of some key parts of Linux (such as the kernel, apache, etc), even if they are distributed under the GPL. But they do own the copyrights (and can therefore change the license at will) for a lot of user-space tools that would make it pretty hard to build a usable system without. Matt -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
![]() |
|
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |