We're back in Wonderland, where up is down and it's off with IBM's head in SCO's happy dreams.

[gaf at blu.org (Jerry Feldman)]

On Mon, 5 Feb 2007 19:11:25 -0500
Robert L Krawitz <rlk at alum.mit.edu> wrote:

> Not necessarily.  If IBM violated what amounts to a non-disclosure
> agreement, they could be liable, but that wouldn't automatically make
> downstream users liable for anything.  I would expect that there would
> have to be an outright copyright (or patent) violation for downstream
> users to have any liability
This is another part of SCO's claim, but most of that has been thrown
out. 

> Not that I expect it to get anywhere close to that, since SCO's theory
> is IMHO ridiculous.
I expect that both Dale Kimball and Brooke Wells are tired of SCO's
pranks.
-- 
Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org>
Boston Linux and Unix user group
http://www.blu.org PGP key id:C5061EA9
PGP Key fingerprint:053C 73EC 3AC1 5C44 3E14 9245 FB00 3ED5 C506 1EA9