| Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | About BLU |
Quoting markw at mohawksoft.com:
> (1) There was nothing on the drives to read.
> (2) Read is almost always faster than write and write is usually the least
> cached data transfer, so, to me at least, write would seem to be the most
> indicative of real performance.
>
> I really just wanted to confirm some basic assumptions and thought the
> results might be useful to people thinking similarly.
I'm more worried about stability of the RAID in the face of drive failure..
-derek
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB)
URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH
warlord at MIT.EDU PGP key available
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.