BLU Discuss list archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

IDE, SATA, RAID0, RAID4, and RAID5

Subject: IDE, SATA, RAID0, RAID4, and RAID5
From: markw at mohawksoft.com (markw at mohawksoft.com)
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 21:37:00 -0500 (EST)
In-reply-to: <45C93293.4010409@mattgillen.net>
References: <16736.24.91.171.78.1170786069.squirrel@mail.mohawksoft.com> <fe37588d0702061002l7f72884fod7e7b25389bb7367@mail.gmail.com> <16677.24.91.171.78.1170788615.squirrel@mail.mohawksoft.com> <45C93293.4010409@mattgillen.net>

> The dd technique may get you strange results for a few reasons including
> the
> lack of going through the filesystem code (your 'of' was the raw device
> file).

I purposely used the block device to eliminate the file system and test
the devices themselves.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

References:
- IDE, SATA, RAID0, RAID4, and RAID5
  - From: markw at mohawksoft.com (markw at mohawksoft.com)
- IDE, SATA, RAID0, RAID4, and RAID5
  - From: kristian.hermansen at gmail.com (Kristian Hermansen)
- IDE, SATA, RAID0, RAID4, and RAID5
  - From: markw at mohawksoft.com (markw at mohawksoft.com)
- IDE, SATA, RAID0, RAID4, and RAID5
  - From: me at mattgillen.net (Matthew Gillen)

Prev by Date: Forest for the trees
Next by Date: Parallel vs Serial speed (was: IDE, SATA, RAID0, RAID4, and RAID5)
Previous by thread: IDE, SATA, RAID0, RAID4, and RAID5
Next by thread: Parallel vs Serial speed (was: IDE, SATA, RAID0, RAID4, and RAID5)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread


BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org