Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On 2/20/07, Matthew Gillen <me at mattgillen.net> wrote: > Not to start a distro flame-war, but the reason that stuff is included in > Ubuntu's official repos is that Ubuntu is virtually alone among the > non-commercial distros in that it includes non-free (license- and/or > patent-encumbered) software in the "official" distribution (unlike Debian or > Fedora)... Right. It is a delicate issue, and I also do not enjoy using non-free drivers. However, it is one step better than using a complete proprietary system that utilizes all closed-source software such as Microsoft Windows. rms would kick your ass, but you are the consumer, so decide for yourself! > Whether you think that is a good thing or not depends on how much religion you > have about free software principles. To be fair, I'll admit that Fedora's > (and likewise, Debian's) situation is kind of pain for users who want things > to work out-of-the-box. Choose your poison wisely... -- Kristian Hermansen -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |