Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Maybe since we're all linux geek we should use a unix timestamp that's UTC Matt On 3/2/07, Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org> wrote: > On Fri, 2 Mar 2007 16:17:19 -0500 > "Martin Owens" <doctormo at gmail.com> wrote: > > > Indeed; it isn't a us vs yous fight I want here. In the uk we would > > say 21st March 2007 and thus shortened to 21/03/2007; but I wouldn't > > use that date form here because it's ambiguous to us people. instead > > the iso date format allows dates to be read by anyone in the world > > including mathematicians. > Not true. A mathematician wants something like 1172873948.0547. :-) > > > -- > Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org> > Boston Linux and Unix user group > http://www.blu.org PGP key id:C5061EA9 > PGP Key fingerprint:053C 73EC 3AC1 5C44 3E14 9245 FB00 3ED5 C506 1EA9 > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss at blu.org > http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |