Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On 3/18/07, jbk <jbk at mail2.gis.net> wrote: > I had a tape drive fail this week. It happened right before > a kernel update on my machine that caused me to erroneously > file a bug with redhat. I have been following the discussion > on backup strategies on this forum and fedoraforum and I've > decided that for me backing up to tape is still the best > option. I currently have a travan 4 drive and I could move I am interested in why you have decided to stick with tape. I have read research papers that claim tapes fail nearly 100% of the time given some pretty common constraints (time, backup method, rotation, etc). IIRC, this biggest factor was the high probability of failed restoration from a backup tape. In the end, it should be cheaper to backup to disk, right? And if it is a USB/Firewire removable drive, you can still store it in a vault between backups. I'm just really interested in how you came to the conclusion that tape is still the best method for you :-) -- Kristian Hermansen -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |