Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 05:35:20PM -0400, John Abreau wrote: > I'm setting up a backup server using rsnapshot to do rsync backups > over ssh. The plan is to backup all systems to the central backup > server each night, and then back the server up to tape. > > As I understand it, Amanda sits on top of gnu tar. Can gnu tar do > the right thing with the hard links so it doesn't try to backup the > daily directories redundantly? On other words, ff the backups use > 10 GB of disk space, and there are 10 daily/monthly directories, I don't > want Amanda trying to back up 100 GB of data. > > I believe dump(8) and restore(8) do the right thing in this case. > Can amanda be configured to use dump and restore instead of > gnu tar? Actually, by default Amanda uses dump and restore, but can optionally use tar. GNU tar does the right thing, too. -dsr- -- .. .----. -- .-. . .- -.. .. -. --. -.-- --- ..- .-. -- .- .. .-.. .-.-.- .-- .... --- . .-.. ... . .. ... ..--.. http://tao.merseine.nu/~dsr/eula.html is hereby incorporated by reference. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |