Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Dan Ritter wrote: | > Jerry Feldman wrote: | > Is it just me, or is this complete gibberish: | > "Emphasize the value of the ecosystem and integrity of the platform" | | A quick translation: | | ... And it will have a | GUI. Linux is largely configured by people typing things into | text files; that requires much more skill than answering a | simple series of questions. More skill means more money." The main thing that struck me about that site's sales talk was that it's a nice illustration of the opposite. It took me a fair amount of poking at random to get it to perform for me, and even then, I was never too sure why what I poked gave the response that I got. It shows a major problem with many GUI tools: The user has to learn every app from scratch. A lot of time is wasted exploring the GUI to figure out how to get it to do what you want. Even something that you've used before can be "new" after a few months away from it, because nothing carries over from other apps, and you don't remember what little you learned about a tool the last time you had to use it. The unix/linux crowd, OTOH, figured out the benefits of a (somewhat) consistent, text-based config scheme. You only need to learn an editor to make changes, and any editor will do. A config file can easily contain commented-out examples of all the possibilities, with accompanying comments. You can easily jump around in a text file by scanning for keywords or by marking lines for later reuse, This is usually much easier than remembering how to navigate a maze of windows with no coherent organization. I wonder how the MS sales folks would respond to linux sales people using this site as a bad example of how the MS GUI approach works? -- _' O <:#/> John Chambers + <jc at trillian.mit.edu> /#\ <jc1742 at gmail.com> | | -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |