Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On 3/22/07, Tom Metro <blu at vl.com> wrote: > Their technique is pretty simple, and essentially it does work as you > originally speculated before you found the paper. The technique can be > summed up as: Nice writeup :-) I read the paper, but it's still good to hear someone else's take on it... > > However, Gmail catches them every time :-) > > I wouldn't say every time. But it does a darn good job. I primarily use > Gmail via POP, so it is inconvenient to reclassify messages, but have > done so on a few occasions - both for false positives and false > negatives. Perhaps a few times a quarter I'll get some spam. More > frequently for spam redistributed by mailing lists. Statistically, for the amount of email I receive, I get SPAM from Gmail 0% of the time. And even the SPAM I get is stuff that I usually signed up for accidentally through proxy (online ordering, etc). I would estimate that I get 1 genuine SPAM message per month. And this message usually addresses me by name, and then goes into how much money I can make if I would just fly to Zaire and accept the $4,000,000 deposit into my bank account... -- Kristian Hermansen -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |