Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
I started discussing this at the last meeting. I'm looking to migrate most of the guts of my current server to my daughter's computer. Right now I have a AMD Athlon XP 2400+ (with will be quite an upgrade from my daughter's current Celeron 466 or so). It's almost always 95% idle or more. But I just got MythTV up and running (next meeting, anyone?). I have hardware encoding so recording isn't a problem, but when I need to transcode video with ffmpeg, it gets slammed. And if I try to do that while it's recording, the box sometimes locks up cold and needs to be rebooted. I'm not looking to go cutting edge. In fact, I'm somewhat concerned about power consumption, which is why I'm trying to rule the world with one server. But I do feel if I go dual core, ffmpeg can slam one core and everything else can get by on the other one. Obviously I'll be going faster, too, and with more RAM for good measure. I've never had a dual core machine before. I've also never had 64 bit before, but I'm considering that, too. I've heard there are certain situations where it's actually slower, and I have an unfounded fear of not being able to find x86_64 packages. I know it's stupid, but remember I'm 80% Software Engineer, 20% SysAdmin. So I'm looking for CPU/motherboard recommendations, and for someone to tell me I'm stupid for being afraid of 64 bit. Thanks in advance. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |