![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Thursday 03 May 2007 15:48:52 Derek Atkins wrote: > Jarod Wilson <jarod at wilsonet.com> writes: > > iff your kernel is built with PAE support, which in my world, is not the > > case for the base kernel. Red Hat's stock i686 kernel is non-PAE, as > > there are i686 systems that don't support PAE, and will fail to boot. Red > > Hat also ships an i686 kernel-PAE package for those that need PAE. But so > > far as I know, PAE is really only relevant/needed if you have *more* than > > 4GB of RAM on a 32-bit system. That seems to fall in line with the rest > > of Alex's comments below. > > Yeah, I suppose I could go install the PAE kernel to try it.. > I know I have 4GB. But lots of places seem to imply that > the chipset max is 3GB. > > I was hoping that Linux would be able to access it all, but > I can't see how to get Linux to see that extra 1GB. Yeah, some hardware simply isn't built to handle that much memory in an efficient manner. I have two different x86_64[1] systems with 4x 1GB stick in 'em, both running x86_64 Fedora 7. One can only access right around 3GB no matter what, the other can get at the full 4GB. Note that the 3GB system is a desktop-class AMD64 board with 4 memory slots, the 4GB system is a server-class dual socket opteron board with 8 memory slots. [1] so PAE vs. non-PAE doesn't even come into play -- Jarod Wilson jarod at wilsonet.com -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
![]() |
|
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |