![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Daniel Feenberg <feenberg at nber.org> writes: > We have tested quad core and dual core Intel core 2 duo processors doing > statistical calculations (long float arithmetic, mostly) and found the > quad core runs 4 independent processes at just about the same speed (each) > as 2 dual core processors of the same clock rate run them. So no advantage > seen to more sockets, only cores and clock rates count. None of the > processes is multi-threaded. > > Our little compute cluster ended up with 3 quad core motherboards and 1 > double socket dual core. All 4 machines have nearly the same capacity. > This could be an artifact of floating point, we haven't tested other load > types. Have you tested memory-intensive tasks and whether you get more memory bandwidth in a quad-core or 2x dual-core? Have you compared Intel to AMD for memory throughput? I don't know your application so I don't know if it's memory bound or CPU bound. > Daniel Feenberg -derek -- Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB) URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH warlord at MIT.EDU PGP key available -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
![]() |
|
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |