Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
jbk wrote: > Kristian Hermansen wrote: > >> libata is far superior than the old IDE subsystem. However, if you >> need to disable it for any reason, you should be able to pass an >> option to the kernel like libata=0. Check the docs... > > Yes, it looks like libata might be far superior as long as you don't > have devices that are out of the main stream. I don't know which docs to > read. Libata is too new to be in the kernel parameters doc, and is not > well documented itself. Looking for something that the maintainers would > never think you would want to do... > > Jim KR > > I stand corrected on the kernel parameters doc, here is what I found: combined_mode= [HW] control which driver uses IDE ports in combined mode: legacy IDE driver, libata, or both (in the libata case, libata.atapi_enabled=1 may be useful as well). Note that using the ide or libata options may affect your device naming (e.g. by changing hdc to sdb). Format: combined (default), ide, or libata So in case I'm dense how do I decipher this? Jim KR -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |