Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Martin Owens wrote: > Those dates don't make sense, April 2012, May 2008 and June 2004. > > Could we try and stick to ISO date formats please, if you'd had put > the year in at the start it would have worked too. otherwise print > month names is also readable. There's zed chance of that happening on a regular basis on this list ;) That's just kinda what we do here. DD/MM or MM/DD is akin to the endian debate. Whenever I put a date in a filename, I use YY[YY]MMDD, but when talking to local humans, in this locale we write MM/DD. Yes, it's ambiguous, but so is about 40% of what humans do, -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |