![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
I think DOS would be good. jk ;-) If you're considering RHEL, check out CentOS instead since it's free and it's built on the RHEL SRPMS. On 5/17/07, markw-FJ05HQ0HCKaWd6l5hS35sQ at public.gmane.org <markw-FJ05HQ0HCKaWd6l5hS35sQ at public.gmane.org> wrote: > After our discussions, I decided to buy an AMD Athlon 64X2 6000 dual core > system. (Barebones + video + 4G RAM) (Oh! Does anyone remember when hard > disks were 4G? But I digress) > > I am currently using Kubuntu 6.10 on my desktop, CentOS 4.4 on my servers, > RedHat RHEL 4.4 at work on one machine, Microsoft Windows XP at work on > another machine, Slackware on my robot project, and Kubuntu 6.10 on my > laptop. > > (1) Is Linux 64bit "real?" i.e. everything works, or is it 90% of > everything works and some don't? > > (2) If I have 64bit Linux, will 32bit apps run? > > (3) If I have 64bit Linux, will GCC/G++ target 32bit environments? > > (4) Should I just use 32bit until 64bit is real (ignore if #1 is "yes") > > What's your personal experience with 64bit Linux? > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org > http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
![]() |
|
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |