BLU Discuss list archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RHEL5 virtualization and/or vs VMware

Subject: RHEL5 virtualization and/or vs VMware
From: gaf-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org (Jerry Feldman)
Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 11:24:56 -0400
In-reply-to: <Pine.GSO.4.64L.0705231052580.1639-xHh8I1Fpm5o9H4hsQj7eYGgAvss3tYSXh13vi7wywA4@public.gmane.org>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.64L.0705231052580.1639@scrubbing-bubbles.mit.edu>

On Wed, 23 May 2007 10:56:31 -0400 (EDT)
Scott Ehrlich <scott-DPNOqEs/LNQ at public.gmane.org> wrote:

> I notice RHEL5 Desktop has an option for a built-in virtualization=20
> feature and MultiOS.
>=20
> Does this mean RH has its own way to support multi OSes with no need for=
=20
> VMWare, or does it augment VMWare?
You missed the March BLU Meeting "Linux Soup X: RHEL5 Virtualization"
In any case, the virtualization in RHEL is based on Xen.=20

--=20
Jerry Feldman <gaf-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org>
Boston Linux and Unix user group
http://www.blu.org PGP key id:C5061EA9
PGP Key fingerprint:053C 73EC 3AC1 5C44 3E14 9245 FB00 3ED5 C506 1EA9

References:
- RHEL5 virtualization and/or vs VMware
  - From: scott-DPNOqEs/LNQ at public.gmane.org (Scott Ehrlich)

Prev by Date: RHEL5 virtualization and/or vs VMware
Next by Date: RHEL5 virtualization and/or vs VMware
Previous by thread: RHEL5 virtualization and/or vs VMware
Next by thread: RHEL5 virtualization and/or vs VMware
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread


BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org