Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
David Kramer wrote: > Tom Metro wrote: >> One example of this is the way they configure apache2 sites using >> /etc/apache2/sites-available/ and /etc/apache2/sites-enabled/ >> directories. It's a good organization scheme, but you won't find >> information on it at apache.org. > > Sometimes "standards-conformant is better than "better". Generally, yes, but in this specific example the Debian package didn't break with existing standards, it simply provided extra infrastructure to ease the management of sites. The failure was in not making documentation readily available for that enhancement. Had I not found the documentation, it would have been easy enough to ignore the enhancement and work directly with the config file using documentation from apache.org. A lot of valuable details get worked out by the people who build packages that can greatly ease the initial setup of an application. From sensible default configurations to interactive setup scripts. Polish that the upstream developers generally don't have the time to add, or can't, because they need to support not just multiple distributions, but often multiple operating systems. These enhancements typically do make the packages better, without making them non-standards-conformant. >> What's really needed is a package-specific wiki, tied-in to the web UI >> for browsing packages. That way for any given package in the >> distribution, you know exactly where to look for the >> distribution-specific notes. > > You mean like /usr/share/doc/*... No. I mentioned the README files in that directory, and the problem with it is that it is inconvenient to access it. You can't do 'man apache' or equivalent to view it. I bet lots of users don't even know those files exist. A centralized wiki would be both more visible, and more user friendly. Chances are it would also be better maintained. > ...for almost 1,000 packages on the FC6 install on my server? 1,000 packages on a server? Wow. I have about half that on my mail server, and it has a bunch of unused cruft waiting to be cleaned out. >>> With the "official" distro, I know where everything gets >>> installed and what files need attention. > > rpm -ql foo dpkg-deb -c /var/cache/apt/archives/foo.deb But even easier is just browsing to the file listing at packages.debian.org. -Tom -- Tom Metro Venture Logic, Newton, MA, USA "Enterprise solutions through open source." Professional Profile: http://tmetro.venturelogic.com/ -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |