Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
> On 6/5/07, markw-FJ05HQ0HCKaWd6l5hS35sQ at public.gmane.org <markw-FJ05HQ0HCKaWd6l5hS35sQ at public.gmane.org> wrote: >> Now, if you tell my that my properly constructed queries need to be >> rewritten to work with MySQL, I will tell you instead that MySQL is >> lacking basic SQL functionality. > > I took a course in college where we went into database design and > optimization. We used PostgreSQL over MySQL. I found the same to be > true of what you just said. However, most people don't know that > PostgreSQL's features are a super-set of MySQL. And to be honest, > probably most people who are using databases are using them > inefficiently anyways and don't care. Many people also associate LAMP > and that's where their MySQL experience comes from. If it didn't > spell "lamp", that stack wouldn't be as successful. Who wants to sit > on my "LAPP" stack instead? I think people get familiar with one > implementation and forget the rest because it is so popular. This > happens all the time, even if a better product exists. Everyone who > knows databases already knows that PostgeSQL is of much higher > quality. You just have to worry about the rest of the people... I could go on and on about software developers who ignore the nature of databases. It drives me crazy. You wouldn't put up with a developer who didn't understand or know the language they were developing in, why do people put up with ignorance about databases if your application uses them? I can categorically say that *any* software developer that chooses MySQL without a very specific reason should be fired. The "good enough" excuse is laziness. I know it is harsh to say, but your database can be a very important component in your system, ignorance of the technology is inexcusable in a professional setting. > > However, SQLite performance is a bit shabby, even in comparison to > MySQL!!! I use SQLite a lot when performance does not matter and flexibility is important. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |