![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
[quote] > This seems to be the heart of the argument for mySQL. > Not that it's a good tool for everything. Just >that it's good enough for a lot of things, and when it >isn't, you can use something else. And it is a flawed argument for the above reasons. The "only" reason people can come up with is that it is "good enough," but that requires some understanding and quantification of "enough" that I submit has not been achieved. [/quote] may i rephrase your argument? what u really r saying is, there is no situation where mysql is good enough. because if the 'dev' knew more (s)he wouldn't have picked mysql! markw = screw mysql because you feel so strongly about this, even though i currently have no _need_ for another database, i will check out others, just for information purposes. u win vs me. this time... - eric c. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
![]() |
|
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |