Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Sorry, yes it also holds true for any RH based distro (Fedora, CentOS, Whitebox, Scientific, etc) -matt On 6/28/07, Matt Shields <mattboston-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org> wrote: > "uname -a" will tell you what arch types the system can use. no, you > need to reinstall > > -matt > > On 6/28/07, Scott Ehrlich <scott-3s7WtUTddSA at public.gmane.org> wrote: > > Is there a way to check whether 32 or 64-bit RHEL5 was installed on a > > system? For that matter, any way to check 32 or 64-bit versions of any > > RedHat or Linux-based (including Debian/Ubuntu) system? > > > > Next, if a user's system was installed with 32-bit RHEL5, is there a > > reasonable way to upgrade it to 64-bit? Can the 64-bit CDs be installed > > and let them take over? Does a fresh install need to be done? > > > > Would the same hold true for Fedora, CentOS, etc? > > > > Please advise. > > > > Thanks. > > > > Scott > > > > -- > > This message has been scanned for viruses and > > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > > believed to be clean. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Discuss mailing list > > Discuss-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org > > http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > > > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |