![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On 8/8/07, Matthew Gillen <me-5yx05kfkO/aqeI1yJSURBw at public.gmane.org> wrote: > Can you elaborate on how Fedora is not geared toward businesses? Fedora users cannot purchase official support as they can with Red Hat. Canonical offers a support program for Ubuntu through their website. http://www.ubuntu.com/support/paid If an enterprise wants Red Hat-based support, they can't be running Fedora. Or maybe you know of some deal where this is possible? > Not really. If it were just a bunch of bits, then Fedora would have an > official commercial repo too (if not now, then soon). There's nothing special > (from a purely technical standpoint) about Ubuntu that allows them to have > such a thing and not Fedora (or Debian for that matter). And Fedora just as well could have a commercial repository. But maybe the users don't want it. I have no idea... > It's also about your rights with the software. Can I, as a sys-admin, make an > image of a given system and replicate it as much as I want? Or do I have to > keep track of software licenses, and generate new license keys for each new > machine, etc. Can I derive my own custom/specialized distribution from the > packages that distro X provides? Or do I have to examine each package to > check it's licensing to see if I'm allowed to re-distribute it? You can do whatever you want. If you want an entirely free Ubuntu, use Gobuntu. It is everything you want, without any proprietary code creeping into your distro :-) > This is where the "official" package restrictions in Fedora and Debian provide > a lot of value: I know that every package is freely redistributable without > having to spend any time at all looking at individual packages. Debian's > strict adherence to this policy was no doubt a boon to Ubuntu when it was > first getting off the ground... That is why repositories are separated into main, restricted, universe, and multiverse. main == 2200 core packages. Restricted is less than 10 packages or so. Universe is everything that is user contributed and free. Multiverse is the stuff that has non-free licensing pertaining to modifications, but is distributable. You have many options. If you want, only use main and universe and leave off restricted and multiverse. Use the source Luke :-) -- Kristian Erik Hermansen -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
![]() |
|
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |