Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
> > Additionally, since one of the counter claims by Novell in this case is > some license fees owed to it by SCO, this case could possibly place SCO > into bankruptcy. I suspect that SCO will have a rescuer since the Unix > license authority that SCO holds are important to major players, such > as IBM, Sun, HP, SGI, Microsoft and other commercial Unix vendors. > (Microsoft is a licensee because of its Microsoft Services for UNIX). >From my understanding, the reason that the original SCO (not SCOX) and Novell deal was set up the way it was (i.e. Novell still owns the copyright) was because they wanted to retain control of licensing if the original SCO went bankrupt. I'd guess that condition would also apply to SCOX. I don't know how the major UNIX licensees would feel about Novell directly controlling licensing, but I don't see a major problem with that. Bill Bogstad -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |